Home arrow Fall 2007
Fall 2007
From the Director

UWC Executive Director Valerie Balester advises faculty to view online services such as Turnitin.com as just one component of a larger plan to discourage plagiarism. For more information on how writing instructors can foster academic integrity, see “Teaching Tips” on page 7.

This summer, Instructional Technology Services (ITS) advised Texas A&M University students to exclude identifying information on work submitted to Turnitin.com—the popular plagiarism detection service—because of privacy concerns. Their advice reminds us that any time we bring a new technology to the classroom, we should recognize its limitations and consider its larger implications.

Some professionals in the field of composition worry that plagiarism detection tools, such as Turnitin.com, may be detrimental to student writing. The most influential professional organization in composition, the Conference on College Communication and Composition (CCCC), suggests that this kind of plagiarism detection program “undermines students’ authority over the uses of their own writing.” In other words, it takes away students’ sense that their writing conveys their own ideas in their own words. When students write with authority, they are not just spitting back “what the teacher wants.”

Why, you might ask, should we care? After all, student writing is just practice writing, isn’t it? It’s not like our writing as academics, which is our bread and butter.

But when we treat student writing as inconsequential, so do students, and the result is the careless productions that we are working to remedy with W courses. Students who do not feel pride of ownership and control over their writing will not give it the time and attention it needs to be excellent.

Composition faculty are also concerned that plagiarism detection programs create an expectation that most students will cheat. Few will do so, although many will document improperly or plagiarize inadvertently. The assumption that students need to be caught undermines trust and makes writing even more distasteful, reinforcing the common belief that it is simply one more hurdle to jump before graduation.

The CCCC also worries that programs like Turnitin.com make faculty complacent by shifting responsibility for detecting plagiarism onto technology. It’s only a matter of time before students learn to beat the system. I have personally tested the service with students, asking them to enter plagiarized writing deliberately for my class; many of their transgressions went undetected. That means students who rely heavily on reports from Turnitin.com or similar services may never discover their errors. More important, they may never learn how to avoid those errors.

Learning citation properly is far more than learning a set of rules; it is learning how a discipline creates and disseminates knowledge. It is subtle, takes time to master, and is the mark of a professional. Still, difficult as it is to teach, we must do so.

As instructors, we cannot let a technology find all the errors, and then, without discussing those errors, expect students to correct them. Turnitin.com cannot teach how to ease a citation into a text without distracting the reader, nor can it teach the difference between direct or indirect quotations, or when or why something might be considered common knowledge. It cannot explain why in some citation styles dates are foregrounded, while in others they are not, nor show why some documents provide internal citations, while others do not.

The key is responsible and ethical use of Turnitin.com. Syllabi should always say if students are expected or required to use it, and they should be informed of the privacy issues raised by ITS. Make sure they know what “identifying information” means. Better yet, do not require the use of Turnitin.com, but make it available to students to use in drafting their writing. Offer help in interpreting results.

Most important, devote class time to discussing the logic of citation and explaining to your students the ways that knowledge is disseminated in your discipline. After all, no technology will ever supplant the need for sound teaching.

 
Online and on point: Teaching with blogs and wikis

Although students spend more and more time online, not all are truly tech savvy. Before using a blog or wiki, assess how comfortable your students are with the technology required.

Two of the newest online tools available to writing instructors, blogs and wikis, can be a boon to student writing, but instructors who have used them say it’s important to employ them purposefully.

For instance, blogs—online journals that include text, photos, videos, and Web links—emphasize one person’s perspective and are useful for monitoring students’ grasp of material.

Wikis, which allow students to create and revise Web pages quickly and easily, are ideal for group work. A wiki can be edited by anyone at any point in the process, and all revisions are recorded.

Associate Professor Jamie Callahan originally turned to blogs to solve a problem with one of her graduate courses. Callahan, who teaches in the Department of Educational Administration and Human Resource Development, knew her grad students weren’t doing the required reading for the class.

Callahan tried quizzes, one-minute in-class writing assignments, and mini-papers—to no avail.

“Those things took time away from class, and students weren’t really reflecting on the reading: they were simply trying to guess what I wanted them to say,” Callahan explains.

After attending a UWC workshop on teaching with blogs and wikis, Callahan asked students to write blog entries reflecting on assigned reading. It worked.

Callahan has now used blogs in a half-dozen classes and plans to continue.

“I feel certain that my students are not only learning more, but learning more deeply. Blogs enable that to happen,” she says. “Blogs became the vehicle for me to create the kind of learning atmosphere I wanted in class.”

Callahan can access her students’ blogs at any time to check progress. She knows who’s making regular entries and who’s posting five minutes before the deadline. And she—and other students—can offer feedback.

She assigns a nominal grade to the blog to make sure students follow through, although for some that’s not necessary.

“I’ve had some students continue to maintain the blog and use it to talk about other classes,” she notes.

For Nancy Small, a lecturer in the Department of English, it was a wiki that helped her solve a familiar teaching dilemma: knowing who contributed what in a group project.

She actually forbids students in her English 301 technical writing course from meeting in person. Instead, they’re required to use the wiki’s discussion forums and chats to complete their work.

“This helps me track their participation. At the end of the semester, if three people tell me the fourth in their group wasn’t contributing, I have a digital record to refer to,” she explains.

Wikis are also convenient— for Small and her students. “I think about doing this kind of project without a wiki. It would be doable, but clunky. A wiki streamlines it.”

She also thinks the wiki helps prepare students for the workplace: “Wikis are being used more and more in business. Students will inevitably encounter some form of collaborative work environment. It may not be called a wiki, but they could be working with one person from Bangladesh, one from New York, and one from Montreal, all on one document.”

Concern about her students’ future careers also prompted Small to add a blog to her advanced composition course. Her students keep a professional blog discussing their career goals and offering links to Web sites relevant to their field.

Small envisions the blogs as “online professional portfolios” that will supplement her students’ resumes when they apply for jobs or graduate school.

Before adding a blog or a wiki to a class, Callahan and Small suggest that instructors assess both their own technological capabilities and those of their students, who aren’t always as tech savvy as we assume. While Callahan says blogs truly “took no effort,” her one experiment with using a wiki failed, because neither she nor her students felt comfortable with it. She plans to try again, but only when she has more time to experiment.

Small and Callahan also agree that before adding a blog or wiki to a syllabus, instructors should consider what they hope students will gain. As Callahan sees it, instructors have to be “strategic about what they’re trying to accomplish and not use the technology because it’s the flavor of the day.”

Instructors interested in learning more about teaching with blogs or wikis are invited to attend a UWC faculty workshop on the subject on Monday, December 10th at 2 p.m. in Heldenfels 004. The workshop will be conducted by Candace Schaefer, associate director of the UWC, and Jeff Kurtz of Instructional Technology Services. To register, visit writingcenter.tamu.edu.

 
Want writing help? Download it.

Interns Meghan Wall and Mandy Crawford will work with W Course instructors to create customized podcasts for their students, who can download content to a computer or MP3 player.

UWC podcasts can improve writing, teaching

Downloading is the latest way for both students and faculty to get information from the University Writing Center (UWC), which now offers two writing- oriented podcast series, as well as customized podcasts for individual W courses.

The UWC’s initial podcast offering, Write Away, is aimed at faculty. Most episodes feature a brief interview, usually with a W course instructor or visiting scholar who addresses common concerns in teaching writing, from responding to student error to using technology in a writing-intensive course. Episodes last from six to 10 minutes. This fall the UWC launched a second podcast, Write Right, which is aimed at students. One typical episode offers advice on interpreting writing assignments; another takes listeners on an audio tour of Evans library.

“How can we disseminate more information about writing to more people? That’s a basic question for any writing center, and creating podcasts seemed a logical next step in our outreach,” explains UWC Executive Director Valerie Balester. “We were fortunate to have some exceptionally talented interns who took this project on and brought it to fruition.”

Mandy Crawford, a senior telecommunication media studies major, has overseen the podcast endeavor since August 2006. Crawford edits and hosts Write Away, while junior Meghan Wall, a speech communication major, is developing the student-oriented series.

Crawford, noting the popularity of other writing-focused podcasts like Grammar Girl, thinks the UWC material will have broad appeal among students.

“You look around campus, and everybody is listening to an iPod,” Crawford notes. “This generation is used to convenience and entertainment, so we’re presenting information on writing in a convenient and entertaining way.”

But Crawford isn’t looking only to please students; the UWC’s newest podcast innovation is designed to make life easier for W course instructors as well.

Crawford and Wall can now create customized podcasts to suit the specific needs of individual departments or courses. For instance, two W course instructors recently asked the Undergraduate Writing Assistant assigned to their course to develop and record a podcast for their students explaining how to conduct a peer review session.

“A podcast can present material the instructor might not have time to go over in class or provide more detail for students who need additional review,” explains Crawford.

Crawford and Wall are happy to walk instructors through the process of creating a podcast. “We’re here for all the technical stuff, but if instructors need someone to host the recording or develop a script, we can do that as well,” says Crawford.

This fall Crawford also created the UWC’s first video podcast, a demonstration of how to use the MS Word Track Changes feature. Additional video projects are currently in development, including demonstrations of how to revise and proofread assignments, complete with visuals of sample pages.

The UWC podcasts can be downloaded from iTunesU or can be accessed directly from the UWC’s Web site at writingcenter.tamu.edu/podcasts. W course instructors interested in developing a custom podcast can contact Dr. Balester at v-balester@tamu.edu.

 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 Next > End >>

Results 10 - 12 of 12

Search UWC @ TAMU

There are no upcoming events currently scheduled.
View Full Calendar

Tidbits

Why she writes

I write entirely to find out what I'm thinking, what I'm looking at, what I see and what it means. What I want and what I fear.

--Joan Didion

 

 

 
spacer.png, 0 kB

1.214 Sterling C. Evans Library | College Station, TX 77843-5000 | (979) 458-1455 phone | (979) 458-1466 fax
Problems with this site? Contact the Webmaster, uwc@tamu.edu.
© 2008 Texas A&M University Writing Center. | Hours and Locations

spacer.png, 0 kB